3 witnesses fail to look earlier than TADA court docket in Jammu – Kashmir Reader

3 witnesses fail to look earlier than TADA court docket in Jammu – Kashmir Reader

Jammu: Three witnesses, together with former Kashmir Bar Affiliation president Mian Abdul Qayoom, failed to look in a particular court docket right here on Thursday in reference to the 1989 abduction of Rubaiya Sayeed, whereas separatist chief Yasin Malik and his affiliate Rafiq Pahloo appeared earlier than it through video-conferencing.

Pahloo was given a ultimate alternative by the particular TADA court docket to file objections to an utility for the cancellation of his bail in a 1990 case through which 4 Indian Air Drive (IAF) officers have been killed case and the kidnapping case of Rubaiya Sayeed, the daughter of the then Union dwelling minister Mufti Mohammad Sayeed.

“4 eyewitnesses have been summoned to look earlier than the particular court docket. Amongst them, Mian Qayoom didn’t seem and submitted a medical certificates that he’s admitted in a hospital. It was stated that one other eyewitness (quantity 23) is useless. Each have been witnesses within the Rubaiya Sayeed abduction case,” Senior Public Prosecutor S Ok Bhat instructed PTI.

Within the case of the killing of the IAF personnel in a terror assault in Srinagar in 1990, the court docket had summoned two witnesses for identification, however they may not seem citing medical causes, Bhat stated, including that each of them needed to come from outdoors.

Bhat stated Jammu Kashmir Liberation Entrance (JKLF) chief Malik and Pahloo appeared earlier than the court docket through video-conferencing.

The court docket would once more hear the case of the killing of the IAF personnel on January 18 and the Rubaiya Sayeed case the subsequent day.

Bhat stated Pahloo was given a final alternative by the court docket for submitting objections to an utility for the cancellation of his bail. The court docket has agreed to summon eyewitnesses.

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) moved an utility in August for the cancellation of Pahloo’s bail within the two instances, informing the court docket that he had violated the bail situations by allegedly indulging in separatist actions.

Two witnesses — numbers 24 and 25 — have been examined in November. They supported the prosecution’s case and recognized accused Ali Mohammad Mir, Bhat stated.

Mir, who’s the prime accused within the abduction case after Malik, had taken Rubaiya Sayeed in his car to Sopore from Srinagar and saved her in a guesthouse.

Malik, who’s lodged in Delhi’s Tihar Jail the place he’s serving a time period in reference to a terror-financing case, was not produced within the court docket bodily as a result of an order issued by the Union Ministry of Dwelling Affairs limiting his motion.

Pahloo is lodged within the Central Jail in Srinagar following his arrest for reviving the terrorist equipment within the Kashmir valley, Bhat stated.

Pahloo alias “Nanaji” was among the many 10 terrorists arrested in July from a resort in a case associated to a conspiracy to revive the banned JKLF and separatist amalgam Hurriyat Convention within the valley.

The particular Terrorist and Disruptive Actions (Prevention) Act court docket has already framed fees individually in opposition to Malik and a number of other others in each instances.

The costs in opposition to Malik, Pahloo and eight others within the 1989 abduction case of Rubaiya Sayeed have been framed by the court docket on January 11, 2021.–(PTI)





#witnesses #fail #TADA #court docket #Jammu #Kashmir #Reader

Kashmir Tourism

Kashmir News

Source Link

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply