SC slams Gujarat Police for tying 5 Muslims to poles, assaulting them

In a scathing critique, the Supreme Courtroom admonished the Gujarat Police on Tuesday for the general public flogging of 5 people from the Muslim neighborhood in 2022.

The courtroom questioned the audacity behind tying them to poles and administering bodily punishment, expressing incredulity on the officers’ actions.

A bench comprising Justices BR Gavai and Sandeep Mehta presided over an enchantment lodged by 4 police personnel—Inspector A V Parmar, Sub-Inspector D B Kumavat, Head Constable Ok L Dabhi, and Constable R R Dabhi—towards a Gujarat Excessive Courtroom order from October 19, 2023.

This order had sentenced them to 14 days of straightforward imprisonment for contempt of courtroom, as they violated the Supreme Courtroom’s tips concerning the detainment and interrogation of suspects.

Justice Gavai, visibly irate throughout the listening to, exclaimed, “What sort of atrocities are these? Do you will have the authority underneath the legislation to tie folks to a pole and beat them?” His sentiments have been echoed by Justice Mehta, who sternly reprimanded the officers for his or her actions and questioned the necessity for the Supreme Courtroom’s intervention.

The officers’ protection, introduced by senior advocate Siddharth Dave, emphasised ongoing legal prosecution, departmental proceedings, and an inquiry by the Nationwide Human Rights Fee (NHRC).

Dave contended that the first subject was the excessive courtroom’s jurisdiction in contempt proceedings relatively than the officers’ culpability.

Nonetheless, Justice Gavai countered, asserting that each police officer ought to pay attention to the legislation laid down within the DK Basu case, which established tips for arrests, detention, and interrogation.

The officers’ declare of ignorance was dismissed, as Justice Gavai declared, “Ignorance of the legislation will not be a sound protection.”

Regardless of arguments towards contempt jurisdiction, the courtroom inquired in regards to the standing of a personal grievance towards the accused policemen.

Senior advocate I H Syed, representing the complainant, confirmed its pending standing. Justice Gavai clarified that, because it was an enchantment, the courtroom wanted to listen to the matter.

Dave sought a keep on the excessive courtroom’s order to forestall the enchantment from turning into infructuous.

In a derisive comment, Justice Gavai quipped, “Go and benefit from the custody. You may be a visitor of your individual officers. They are going to present you particular therapy.” Ultimately, the courtroom acceded to Dave’s request and granted a keep on the sentence.

The case’s historical past, rooted in an incident the place 5 Muslims have been allegedly crushed by the accused policemen, highlighted the violation of Supreme Courtroom tips throughout the arrest and detention course of.

The excessive courtroom, in its October 19, 2023, order, discovered the 4 policemen responsible of contempt and sentenced them to 14 days in jail, with a three-month keep to facilitate their enchantment.

The incident had initially concerned 13 policemen, however after a probe, the CJM specified the roles of solely 4, resulting in the contempt fees.